Selection Rubric

Pre-Screening and Scoring — Selection Committee Level

The Eight Nominee Attributes

Representatives from PHINMA and De La Salle University Manila to select Top Nominees possessing the following attributes:

The nominee exhibits strong ethical standards.
The nominee possesses the ability to transform people around them to achieve their mission.
The nominee identified a problem and innovatively addressed the societal need.
The nominee established a process that makes the enterprise sustainable.
The nominee provided their beneficiaries with the tools to be globally competitive.
The nominee provided their beneficiaries with the opportunities to be globally competitive.
The business or social enterprise has the purpose of nation-building as one of their organizational objectives.
The establishment of a strong national identity with shared societal values is one of the business or social enterprise's objectives.

Scoring Rubric

(1) Pre-Screening and (2) Scoring — Selection Committee level rubric.

Criteria	Partially Meets Standards (1 pt)	Meets Standards (3 pts)	Meets Standards to a Great Extent (5 pts)
Positive Impact on a Community in the Philippines	Demonstrates a localized, beneficial effect on a community; initial efforts in community engagement or development.	Evident and measurable impact on a community, with sustainable benefits and broader community involvement.	Transformative impact with long-term, scalable benefits affecting multiple communities or regions; incorporates nation-building and strengthens national identity.
Entrepreneurial Spirit	Shows initiative and a basic understanding of entrepreneurship; may have started a small-scale venture.	Established entrepreneurial ventures with innovation and problem-solving; demonstrates business acumen and growth potential.	Exceptional entrepreneurial achievements; significant market impact, innovation, and inspiration to others; ethical standards and transformative leadership are evident.
Impact on Business or Social Enterprise (Corporate Citizenship)	Initial efforts in incorporating social responsibility into business practices; some community or environmental initiatives.	Clear, consistent integration of social responsibility in business operations; significant initiatives benefiting society or the environment.	Leading examples of corporate citizenship; pioneering efforts in social responsibility that set industry standards; sustainable processes and global competitiveness are established.
Social Responsibility	Engagement in basic social responsibility activities; limited scope and impact.	Strong, ongoing commitment to social responsibility with noticeable positive outcomes.	Trailblazing in social responsibility; setting benchmarks and having a profound, widespread impact; includes providing tools and opportunities for global competitiveness and shared societal values.

Sample Evidence and Metrics

Sample qualitative evidence and/or metrics that evaluators can look for to comprehensively evaluate the nominees for each of the four criteria:

1. Positive Impact on a Community in the Philippines

Qualitative Evidence

Testimonials from community members about the nominee's contributions.
Case studies demonstrating the nominee's initiatives and their effects on the community.
Media reports or documentary evidence of community projects led by the nominee.

Metrics

Number of individuals positively affected by the nominee's actions.
Percentage improvement in community-specific indicators (e.g., health, education, employment).
Scale and reach of community programs (e.g., number of programs, geographic coverage).

2. Entrepreneurial Spirit

Qualitative Evidence

Narratives of the nominee's journey, highlighting challenges overcome and milestones achieved.
Examples of innovative solutions or products developed by the nominee.
Recognition or awards received for entrepreneurial achievements.

Metrics

Business growth statistics (e.g., revenue, market share, customer base).
Number of new ventures or products launched.
Investment attracted or funding secured for entrepreneurial activities.

3. Impact on Business or Social Enterprise (Corporate Citizenship)

Qualitative Evidence

Descriptions of corporate social responsibility (CSR) initiatives and their alignment with business goals.
Stories of how the business's CSR efforts have led to positive social or environmental change.
Partnerships with other organizations for CSR activities.

Metrics

CSR investment as a percentage of profits.
Impact assessments of CSR initiatives (e.g., carbon footprint reduction, community development projects).
Employee engagement rates in CSR activities.

4. Social Responsibility

Qualitative Evidence

Detailed accounts of social programs and their intended outcomes.
Evidence of long-term commitment to social causes, such as ongoing projects or sustained partnerships.
External evaluations or audits of the social impact made by the nominee's enterprise.

Metrics

Number of beneficiaries served by social programs.
Longitudinal data showing improvements in beneficiaries' lives (e.g., skill levels, income, quality of life).
Scope and diversity of social initiatives (e.g., education, health, environmental sustainability).

How the Eight Attributes Map into the Four Criteria

Explanation on how the eight attributes were incorporated in the four criteria explicitly:

Attribute	Criterion	How Incorporated
1. Ethical Standards	Entrepreneurial Spirit; Social Responsibility	Nominees must demonstrate ethical behavior and adherence to societal values, especially at the highest level of meeting standards.
2. Transformative Leadership	Entrepreneurial Spirit	Nominees must inspire and motivate others, particularly at the highest level of achievement.
3. Innovative Problem-Solving	Entrepreneurial Spirit	Nominees must have identified and innovatively addressed societal needs.
4. Sustainable Processes	Impact on Business or Social Enterprise	The establishment of sustainable business practices is required for meeting standards, especially at the highest level.
5–6. Global Competitiveness	Social Responsibility	Providing tools and opportunities for global competitiveness is a requirement for the highest level of meeting standards.
7. Nation-Building	Positive Impact on a Community in the Philippines	The focus on nation-building is a requirement for the highest level of meeting standards.
8. Strong National Identity	Positive Impact on a Community in the Philippines	Establishing a strong national identity with shared societal values is part of the transformative impact at the highest level of meeting standards.

Apply this rubric directly against each nominee’s file — Louise Mabulo, Henry Motte-Muñoz, and Mari Martirez — assessing each against all four criteria.